The garage or the customer?

A wave of assumptive demands against the judicial dodge, garages who causes fear in some parts of the world are taking advantage of the common image of the garages in Israel - to avoid paying.The courtrooms think differently. Still does not mean you do not need to check your garage well and make sure he maintains the standards and rules of service, professionalism and reliability.

In NY Towing Service we got a lot of calls for roadside assistance service that ends up with Emergency Towing Services and somepresent time it's ends up with an cause with the customer.

"All garages cheats" in all meanings and aspects of course is an ugly nickname general true, especially when most of the public can not (or does not want to) distinguish between legal Garage illegal garage - a national calamity which has become widespread in these parts, and someways the public indifferent to her (and your car is junk going? an unsafe? lost its value? So what - the point that the patch increased $100 less and you feel that 'opened' the mechanic the "May."

And what we get Achshmahbrim these two appellations together? A wave of false claims against the garages. It seems that somehow taken root in public perception that a car in the garage from a dress one time - you become a professional policy?
Vehicle broke down after several months back? So why not blame the shop who used to repair - even if it's a completely different raise up reasonable wear and tear? You is that you made corrections Imprubisoreim neighboring(a)'s backyard? So why do not you upload parts - "loose" because of the neglectfulness garage? And if you have money for repairs to the garage - what you would pay if, instead you can argue that he is causing ill-timed(a) to your car and claim it ("The best defense is attack"?)

Fortunately for the innocent and honest with garages (and the vast legal age course among those legal garages) - There are judges in Israel, and those are not "buying" the whole fib, however faint slip - only because of the defendant is a garage. We brought three-day examples last week alone.

Or so - and only then - the client filed a counter claim against the defendant the sum of the garage 10 times higher (!) That embodied respected tangent in which he argued that the above arguments to explain what had caused damage to the garage and why not a must pay the checks. Besides the fact that he gave the checks two weeks after the vehicle was amended out of the garage did not bother him at all, for some reason. Argued that the garage owner to prevent damage occurred much later because the customer did not bother to fill oil (garage guilty of that too?). At this point, the client - on his own - he left his car at the garage without the consent of the garage man to accept it, or repaired (whether this country is about to impose on the finicky service to not bother to respect the checks you gave him the time before?) Passing the client's method was car equipment $50,000 worth of ...

You know the result - of course the customer claims were rejected. Oh, by the way - All that for $1400 client did not pay. And charged the cost of $3,000 + VAT (in our opinion - not enough).

In the second case a customer sued a garage (again - only two years later) on the grounds that he replaced sparkler in a careless and the client was installed had to do the job again another garage and he has suffered advance damage to other vehicle components. Only Achsnkeaba customer case prosecutor informed debate that fact discovery is changing his mind about element replacing chalk. (According to him - that the vehicle has been disabled in an accident, but it is unclear what relationship if you already replaced the sullied limestone?) A claim flatly rejected a firm assertion: "No evidence at all." The court ruling far-famed that the invoices presented by the client in relation to treatments carried out in a car next year "negligence" - no citation that the components were damaged because of claiming the garage.

The third case, again a client's claim against the garage, to put his motorcycle accident damage repair. Client the "water" had proved his integrity and status of payment and release the car, then paid for by check fix his mother's only problem with him was that it was not at all allowed to sign the checks that was bankrupt at the time. But the client was not fazed and continued to travel another half year, the revised car until another mishap occurred.

Advertisement
Then brought the motorcycle repair shop in his garage next door still had not paid according to him - met him exterior the angry garage owner, attacked him, causing damage to the motorcycle. This claim also was rejected in the absence of any evidence that the customer was charged the cost of $6,000 + VAT.

We believe that if the public will begin legal owners orderly garages instead of trying to save a few pennies, and that if the act with respect to those who give him service - will be feeling weaken on both sides. However, we suggest that the garage not ask permission from the precise explanations for the amendments he performs, the costs, the assembled vehicle parts, the "side effects" option especially - to faithful in an orderly manner and in advance payment.
** Article must be manually approved before URL is available **